不同于保罗·威利斯在《学做工》中描述的工人阶级“小子”的反学校文化,近年来国内民族志调查研究发现,大陆学校的反学校文化具有一定独特性。本文对山东省J市一所中等职业技工学校中的反学校文化现象进行了考察,发现该中职技校里的学生都背负教育分流中“失败者”的标签,职校的培养目标和职业期许也迥异于普通中学。首先,职校中反学校文化群体“冒烟儿的”和其他的“老实孩子”都出身于J市本地乡镇和农村的底层家庭。其次,“冒烟儿的”反抗学校权威只是为了在同辈群体中建构“霸权”地位,既鄙视体力劳动,也否定文凭的作用;而“老实孩子”也只是不正面反抗学校权威,消极懈怠,并未在学习上投入太多时间和精力。两者其实都表现了对职业教育前景不看好,他们的潜意识里对自己“治于人”的底层工人阶级地位感到沮丧和不安。最后,老师和学校领导对待反抗者有自己的一套非正式控制手段,使他们的反学校文化不至于破坏学校的表面秩序,并最终达到一种“再生产”的实质职能。
Compared with the counter-school culture of the working class lads Paul Willis described in Learning to Labor,many recent ethnographic studies in Mainland China found that the mainland schools have very different counter-school culture. This paper investigated and examined the counter-school culture in a middle vocational school in Shandong province,and found all the vocational students were labeled as “losers” in the educational tracking system,and the teaching goals of vocational schools are distinct from general middle schools. First,the “smoked” with counter-school culture and other “well-behaved” students were all from local lower-class families. Second,the “smoked” resisted the school authority was to build their own power and status identity in peer groups,and they despised the labor work,and considered the credential was useless. While although the “well-behaved” did not resist the school authority,they did not work hard,and just worked to rule and took time off. The two groups both distrusted the career future of vocational credentials,and felt frustrated by their destined lower working class status. Finally,the school and teachers developed an informal measure to control the resistant students and to guarantee their counter-school activities not to destroy the facial school order,and finally to complete the class reproduction.