在中国诉美国的“反倾销和反补贴案”(DS379)中,WTO专家组和上诉机构对“双重救济”是否符合WTO协定,作出了不同的裁决。本文全面介绍了中美双方的意见以及专家组和上诉机构的裁决思路,比较典型地反映了WTO上诉机构条约解释的特点。
In the United States-Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China(DS 379),the WTO Panel and Appellate Body reached different conclusions on the consistency of “double remedy” with the WTO rules.Comprehensive opinions from the parites,ie.China and the U.S.,and those of the Panel and the Appellate Body are reflected in this article,with the features of the treaty interpretation by the Appellate Body vividly demonstrated.
Keywords: | AppealSubsidyExplanationInstitution. |