安保法案的制定过程与最终通过是日本执政党及安倍内阁运用多种“合法性”操控手段操控的结果，“合法性”操控体现在立法依据和审议及表决程序等各个环节，新安保法的产生过程实质上出现了日本在立法实践中因合法性被不合理操控致使新法未能实现立法正义的问题。“合法性”操控问题，其逻辑根源在于将程序合法等同于实质正义，法律与政治文化根源在于日本传统法律文化缺陷导致了“形式上的宪法主义”，制度上的根源在于日本违宪审查机制运转不畅。“合法性”操控问题若不能及时纠正，长此以往可能会破坏日本民主与政治制度的根基，需要日本民众、学者与司法界共同努力从立法价值、立法体制及违宪审查机制层面解决。
The “legitimacy” of Japan security legislation has been manipulated by the Abe administration through a variety of means. The manipulation is reflected in all aspects such as the legislative basis，deliberation and voting procedure，which determines the fact that the new security legislation fails to achieve the justice in essence. The cause of Japan’s “legitimacy” manipulation issue is due to the logics that the procedural justice is improperly considered equivalent to the substantive justice in Japan’s security legislation，the “formal constitutional doctrine” derived from Japanese traditional culture and Japanese dysfunctional constitutional review mechanism. If the “Legitimacy” manipulation issue can’t be promptly corrected，in the long term the foundation of Japanese democracy and political system in Japan will be undermined. Japanese people，academics and the judiciary need to work together to solve the problems on the level of the value of legislation，legislative system and constitutional review mechanism.
