文章摘要
2012年欧盟诉中国“稀土案”是2008年以来欧盟连续对中国发起的第五起WTO案件。2014年WTO争端解决机构最终裁定受指控的出口管理措施违反了中国在《中国入世议定书》和GATT 1994项下承担的相关义务。欧盟在指控中国相关出口管理措施的案件中再次胜诉。本案与欧盟诉中国“原材料案”在标的物性质、欧盟诉求、中方抗辩理由等方面具有高度相似性,二者的主要区别仅在于标的物种类不同。对于案件的两个核心法律问题,中国在总结前案经验教训的基础上,本案中进一步完善了抗辩理由,收到了一定的效果。
Abstract
The Rare Earth Case filed in 2012 is the 5th WTO case which the European Union initiated successively against China since 2008. In 2014,the WTO Dispute Settlement Body made a final decision that the export measures imposed on rare earth materials were inconsistent with China’s obligations or not justified under China’s Accession Protocol and the GATT 1994. The European Union won again in the series of cases complained against China’s restrictions on rare earth exportation. The present case and the Raw Materials Case filed in 2009 in the WTO are of a high degree of similarity with respect to the nature of the subject-matter,the European Union’s claims and China’s defenses,with the only exception lying in the type of the subject-matter. Based on the previous experiences and lessons,China has improved its arguments as to the two core legal issues.
作者简介
刘衡:刘衡,国际法学博士,中国社会科学院欧洲研究所助理研究员。