比较地区主义作为一个研究领域,是否恰逢其时?尽管人们对地区及地区主义比较研究的兴趣并非新近之事,但相关研究路径却已不同于以往。社会建构主义和批判理论的兴起,使得我们对地区的认识不再局限于行为主义,而是变得更为精细、复杂、多元和动态,加深了我们对地区构成的理解。此外,全球化现象对所有社会科学都产生了深刻的影响,并从根本上重塑了地区的相对自主性。随着非西方世界中地区主义与地区制度的迅速增长与发展(包括亚洲等起步较晚的地区),出现了地区合作的新视角。新视角主张采用独特的路径与“模式”,不仅与欧盟模式有所区别,而且比欧盟“紧身衣”更适合非西方地区,因此在非西方地区更具“可行性”。
Is comparative regionalism a field whose time has come?While the contemporary interest in comparing regions and regionalisms may be not completely new,it is different from older approaches. Our understanding of what makes regions has changed with social constructivist and critical theoretical approaches that have led to a less behavioural and more nuanced,complex,contested and fluid understanding of regions. Moreover,the globalisation phenomenon has deeply affected all social sciences and radically redefined the relative autonomy of regions. In keeping with the rapid growth and development of regionalism and institutions in the non-Western world,including in regions which were relatively late starters,such as Asia,there have emerged new ways of looking at regional cooperation,including claims about distinctive approaches and even “models” that are not only different from those identified with the EU,but also supposedly more appropriate and thus “workable” for non-Western regions than the EU straightjacket.
| Keywords: | New RegionalismConstructivismComparative RegionalismRegional Integration TheoryNorm Subsidiarity |