近年来,P2P平台不断推出新的业务模式与运作方式,逐渐偏离“信息中介”的角色定位。构罪平台通常存在虚假宣传、设立资金池和提供担保等违规行为,导致非法吸收公众存款罪、集资诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪等犯罪的发生。但对P2P平台进行规制时存在诸多的问题,平台虚假宣传缺乏相关规制,资金池使用过程中的罪与非罪混乱和P2P涉罪案件此罪与彼罪界限模糊等问题都有待解决。因此,应当正确把握刑法介入的限度,既要保持刑法的谦抑性,又要发挥其保障性的作用。坚持刑法规制与行政监管的配合与衔接,两者取长补短解决平台异化问题。同时,还应该建立“数额+情节”的定罪量刑标准。从而有效地促进P2P平台的良性发展,减少犯罪的发生。
In recent years,P2P platform has introduced new business model and operation mode,which gradually deviates from the role of “information intermediary”. There are many illegal behaviors in the platform,such as false propaganda,fund pool and guarantee,which lead to the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits,fund-raising fraud,contract fraud and other crimes. However,there are many problems in the regulation of P2P platform,such as the lack of relevant regulations on platform false propaganda,the confusion of crime and non crime in the use of fund pool,and the fuzzy boundary between this crime and that crime in P2P crime related cases. Therefore,we should correctly grasp the limit of criminal law intervention,not only to maintain the modesty of criminal law,but also to play its protective role. Adhere to the coordination and connection of criminal law regulation and administrative supervision,and solve the alienation platform by learning from each other. At the same time,we should establish the standard of “amount+circumstances”. So as to effectively promote the healthy development of P2P platform and reduce the occurrence of crime.