您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索
热词推荐: 基础设施能源

印巴伊三国的警检制度和对上合组织刑事司法合作的影响(2024)

文章摘要

印度、巴基斯坦、伊朗三国的法律分属于普通法系和宗教法系。三国加入上合组织后,给上合组织的司法合作带来新的因素。在刑事司法方面,上合组织创始六国都具有大陆法和社会主义法传统,检察机关不但具有独立的地位,而且发挥着重要作用。但在印巴两国的普通法传统中,检察院并无重要地位,甚至没有独立建制;加之两国均为联邦制国家,在处理具体案件时中央无法完全代表地方,地方各州省之间的检察院设置和警检之间的关系又各有不同。伊朗的检察院虽然与中俄等国类似,检察院发挥着重要作用,但伊朗法律中的非世俗成分、警察部门的庞大规模和其与军队、安全部门之间的复杂关系,以及司法部门的最终地位等均与上合组织其他成员国有所不同。在三国加入之后,上合组织各国参与司法对口合作的部门应有一定调整,以适应更加复杂的法律环境。

Abstract

The laws of India,Pakistan,and Iran belong to the common law system and the religious law system. The accession of the three countries to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization(SCO)will bring new factors to its judicial cooperation. In terms of criminal judicature,the six founding members of the SCO all have the civil law tradition and the socialist legal tradition. The procuratorate organs of these countries not only have independence but also play an important role. In the common law tradition of India and Pakistan,the prosecutor’s office does not hold an important position and even does not have an independent establishment. In addition,both countries are federal states,and the central government cannot fully represent the local authorities in handling specific cases. The establishment of procuratorates and the relationship between police and prosecutors vary among states and provinces. In terms of Iran,its procuratorate plays an important role,similar to those in countries such as China and Russia. However,the non-secular components of Iranian law,the large scale of the police department,and its complex relationships between the military and security departments,as well as the overall status of the judiciary,are different from other members of the SCO.

作者简介
鲍宏铮:鲍宏铮,国际政治学博士,中国社会科学院世界历史研究所助理研究员。