在国际竞合视野下,全球数字经济竞争政策在理论上和实践上都发生了重要的变革。新布兰代斯学派对芝加哥学派主张的消费者福利这一反垄断目标大肆批评,主张对反垄断理论进行“根和枝干的重构”,这一思潮也影响到美国、欧盟等法域的数字经济反垄断规制。基于我国数字经济反垄断实践,当前竞争和治理最关键的问题在于如何正确理解数字“守门人”监管,科学推进常态化监管和强化创新影响的竞争评估。立足高质量发展和做优做大做强数字经济的国家战略,我国应当避免采用数字“守门人”式的结构主义监管,深入推进稳定可预期,科学、专业、审慎,多工具全链条的常态化监管,从长期竞争的维度看待创新的竞争影响,并进一步加强数字经济竞争政策的国际合作和沟通对话。
In the context of international competition,global competition policy for the digital economy has undergone important changes in both theory and practice. The New Brandeis School has criticized the Chicago School’s antitrust goal of consumer welfare,and advocated the “reconstruction of roots and branches” of antitrust theory,which has also affected the antitrust regulation of the digital economy in the United States,the European Union and other jurisdictions. Based on China’s digital economy antitrust practice,the most critical issue of competition governance is how to correctly understand the digital “gatekeeper” regulation,scientifically promote the normalization of regulation and strengthen the competition assessment of innovation impact. Based on the national strategy of high-quality development and optimizing and strengthening the digital economy,China should avoid adopting the digital “gatekeeper”-style structuralist regulation,promote the stable and predictable,scientific,professional and prudent,multi-tool and full-chain normalized regulation,view the competitive impact of innovation from the perspective of long-term competition,and further strengthen digital competition policy through international cooperation and dialogue.