以不予直链、封闭接口等为表现形式的平台封禁行为具有主体特殊性、目的多样性以及效果复杂性等特征,司法实践中法官对此类行为的不正当认定难以准确把握。在认定依据上,互联网专条适用具有局限性,宜以一般条款加以认定;在认定范式上,既有的行业惯例原则、最小特权原则等裁判规则存在适用依据有待检验、适用范围存在局限和适用效果存在偏差等缺陷。基于此,在宏观上应当明确平台封禁行为的规制理念、规制时机和规制方法;在微观上宜引入比例原则作为具体方法,以目的适当性、手段必要性和结果均衡性考量行为是否构成不正当竞争,以此解决平台经营者权利行使的私权性与公共性之间的冲突,实现多元利益的平衡保护。
Platform blocking behaviour has the characteristics of special subject,diversity of behavioural purpose and complexity of behavioural effect,etc.. In judicial practice,judges find it difficult to accurately grasp the improper determination of such behaviour. In terms of legal basis,the application of Internet special articles has limitations,and should be identified by general articles;in terms of identification paradigm,the existing industry practice principle,the principle of least privilege and other adjudication rules have defects such as the application basis is to be tested,the scope of application has limitations,and the effect of application has deviations. Based on this,the regulatory concept,timing and method of regulation of platform blocking should be clarified on the macro level,and the principle of proportionality should be introduced as a specific method on the micro level,so that the appropriateness of the purpose,the necessity of the means and the balance of the result can be considered to see whether the behaviour constitutes unfair competition,thus solving the conflict between the private right of the platform operator’s exercise of power and the public nature of the symbols of power,and realising the balanced protection of diversified interests.