您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索
热词推荐: 能源基础设施

2023年工具理性与价值理性视角下生成式人工智能的价值与风险——以C...

文章摘要

以ChatGPT为代表的生成式人工智能效益与风险兼具。从工具理性与价值理性的视角出发,探究ChatGPT对政治、经济和社会的影响,更能抓住其风险的本质所在。从工具理性的视角来看,ChatGPT的功能体现为技术赋能、价值赋能及信息赋能,风险体现为影子政府、行业垄断及组织异化。从价值理性的视角看,ChatGPT的功能体现为技术赋权、知识创新及增进效能,风险体现为赋权偏畸、价值扭曲及意识侵蚀。总体而言,ChatGPT是理性生产的工具而非主体,虽然在很大程度上满足了效率要求,但难以解决公平问题,并进一步加深人际关系鸿沟。在本质上,ChatGPT服务于资本增值而非公共利益,因而对于政府治理而言,ChatGPT引发最核心的挑战在于跳出技术依赖以维护公共利益。

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence represented by ChatGPT has both benefits and risks. From the perspectives of instrumental rationality and value rationality,exploring the impact of ChatGPT on politics,economy,and society can better grasp the essence of its risks. From the perspective of instrumental rationality,the functions of ChatGPT are reflected in technology empowerment,value empowerment,and information empowerment,while risks are reflected in shadow government,industry monopoly,and organizational alienation. From the perspective of value rationality,the functions of ChatGPT are reflected in technology empowerment,knowledge innovation,and enhancing efficiency,while risks are reflected in imbalanced empowerment,value distortion,and consciousness erosion. Overall,ChatGPT is a tool for rational production rather than a subject. Although it largely meets efficiency needs,it is difficult to solve fairness issues and further widen interpersonal relationships. Essentially,ChatGPT serves capital appreciation rather than public interest,so for government governance,the core challenge that ChatGPT poses is to break away from technological dependence and maintain public interest.

作者简介
薛泽林:薛泽林,管理学博士,上海社会科学院政治与公共管理研究所副研究员,研究方向为城市治理数字化转型、公共政策分析。
许鑫:许鑫,管理学博士,广西民族大学政治与公共管理学院讲师,研究方向为弹性城市、数字城市。