您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索
热词推荐: 能源基础设施

《明史》所载“中荷首次交往”舛误辨析

文章摘要

作为基本史籍,殿本张廷玉《明史》的“外国传”体现了学界对明代中外关系史的基本认知。其中,《和兰传》所记万历二十九年(1601)中国与荷兰首次交往的史事,多为史家所征引、讨论。张维华早在20世纪30年代指出“和兰传”中的“李道”当为“李凤”,不过他并未对中荷首次交往的记载做更多订正。其后,汤纲等在利用殿本《明史》时,误将“税使李道即召其酋入城,游处一月,不敢闻于朝,乃遣还”的史事放置到“麻韦郎事件”之后,认为1604年荷兰人首先在福建遇阻,才转至香山澳,进而游处广州。1999年,汤开建首次对中荷首次交往的史事展开详细辨析,认为西文史料未载的李凤招引夷酋游处会城一事属实。这一观点后来也得到林发钦、李庆新等学者的认同。然而,此说尚有不少疑点,本文拟就此展开进一步讨论,以求证于方家。

Abstract

During the process of compilation of Ming History in the early Qing dynasty,there are some different records of the first encounter between China and Dutch among different versions. Youdong and Wan Sitong’s versions only offered brief and similar narrations. On the basis of the previous two versions,Wang Hongxu adopted some records of Guofei’s A General History of Guangdong,and added a sentence “Tax envoy Li Dao summoned the chief to the city,and travel for a month there” to Biography of Dutch. Latter this record was accepted and kept in Zhang Tingyu’s version. But according to the western documents,this record is erroneous. Guofei probably mistakenly planted the Spanish friar Diego Aduart’s travel in Guangzhou in 1599 into his records of Hongmao Gui.

作者简介
李庆:李庆,南京大学历史学院助理研究员,研究方向为明清中外关系史、海洋史、天主教史。