透过政治、经济、社会的综合视角，家庭共同体、公民共同体、国家共同体、跨国共同体、跨洲共同体乃至于人类命运共同体是一个逻辑扩展路径。将文化共同体置于时间与空间的坐标中进行立体透视，儒家的“恕道”原则、道家的“无为”原则、文化相对主义、软实力理论成为“他我”同化为“自我”的支持性理论；“自由”“人权”理论、种族理论与社会进化理论、文化帝国主义理论、历史终结论与文明冲突论则将倾向于从“自我”出发排斥甚至否定“他我”。从“汤因比之谜”入手，中国文化经历的文化自然、自觉、自省与自我实现的不断超越路径，展示了东、西方文化在“民主治理”与“民生治理”方面的根本不同，中国文化承担人类命运共同体的内在文化基因与独特的文化结构。
The first part of this paper analyzes the development paths of community，from family community，citizen community，the community of nations and transnational community to cross-continent community and the community of common human destiny based on the views of politics，economy，and society respectively.Moreover，in the second part of this paper，theories of the cultural community divided into the two core dimensions，including time and space，which are compared and analyzed.The Confucianism principle of“shu”，rather the Taoism principle of“wuwei”.Cultural relativism and soft power theory support the view of“himself”assimilation into“myself”.However，“freedom and human rights”theory，ethnic theory，social evolution theory，cultural imperialism theory，as well as the views of historical conclusion and civilization conflict inclined to reject or even deny the view of“himself”based on the perspective of the“myself”.In the third part of this paper，the author analyzes the development routes of cultural naturalization，self-consciousness，self-examination and self-realization of Chinese cultural，and shows the fundamental differences between the eastern and western cultures in“democratic governance”and“people's livelihood governance”.Further，through the analysis of the structural differences between“Home and Country”，it also reveals that Chinese culture bears the inherent cultural genes and unique cultural structures of the community of human destiny.
