您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索
热词推荐: 能源基础设施

检察委员会议案机制实证考察

文章摘要

检察委员会决策机制是我国检察权运作中一种独特的程序场景。然而,“民主集中”的方式并不当然意味着实现集体智慧,办案活动的特殊规律与议案实体功能始终存在难以调和的矛盾。通过机制—功能的视角考察检察委员会的议案情况,不难发现组织结构功能失衡、决策依据不充分、议案质效不高等问题仍然客观存在。检察委员会为完成决策,或异化了与检察官的关系,过度依赖办案个体;或异化了决策程序,延展决策主体。功能弱化的根本原因在于议案机制的形式化运转。当下,应在检察权规范化运行的改革背景下,强化检察委员会议案机制辅助系统的作用发挥,以限制议案范围、明确委员履职方式等保证检察委员会对决策信息的占有,从而提升检察委员会的决策能力。

Abstract

The case-deliberation mechanism of the procuratorial committee is a unique procedural scene in the operation of procuratorial power. However,the “democratic centralization” approach does not necessarily mean the realization of collective wisdom. There are always conflicts that are difficult to reconcile between the special laws of case-handling activities and the substantive functions of bills. From the mechanism-function perspective,it is not difficult to find that problems such as the imbalance of organizational structure function,insufficient decision-making basis,and low quality and efficiency of the proposals still exist objectively. In order to complete its decision-making,the procuratorial committee has either alienated the relationship with the prosecutor and over-relied on the individual handling the case;or alienated the decision-making process and extended the decision-making body. The fundamental reason for the weakening of functions lies in the formal operation of the billing mechanism. At present,in the context of the reform of the standardized operation of the procuratorial power,the role of the auxiliary system of the prosecution committee’s meeting proposal mechanism should be strengthened to limit the scope of proposals and clarify the way members perform their duties to ensure that the procuratorial committee has the possession of decision-making information,thereby enhancing the Procuratorial committee decision-making ability.

作者简介
王彪:王彪,法学博士,西南政法大学诉讼法与司法改革研究中心副教授,硕士生导师。
易志鑫:易志鑫,法学硕士,济南市中级人民法院法官助理。