在《弃猫》一文中,村上春树通过探寻父亲的参战经历直面日本近代侵略战争的真相,此点值得高度肯定。但此文同时也显示出“父亲”这一意象在村上春树文学中不仅仅是指涉“历史”的抽象概念,更是鲜活的个体存在。村上文学中的父亲意象和历史认识不具有等价关系。“父亲”和“历史”二者的必然联系是在社会背景的推动以及村上本人的有意操作下被建构而成的。在“父亲”成为“被历史化”的符号的同时,“历史”也由于村上文学的个人主义底色而被高度“个人情感化”。“后记忆”理论也存在将“父亲”与“历史”等同使用的缺陷,用来解释村上春树文学中的战争书写未必合适。
In Abandoning a Cat,Haruki Murakami seeks to face the true history of Japanese aggression in the second World War through exploring his father’s experience as a soldier. While we should acknowledge the positive aspects of such writing,we should also see that the “father” in both Murakami’s life and his writing does not refer to “history” as an abstract concept;instead,the “father” is also an individual who actually existed in history. The “father” thus cannot be simply equated with “history”. In the post-war social context,Haruki Murakami intentionally manipulates the narration to construct the equivalence between “father” and “history”. While “father” now signifies the history of the war,“history” is heavily colored by Murakami’s personal emotions. The theory of “postmemory”,which tends to simply equate “father” with “history”,is thus inadequate for the analysis of Murakami’s representation of the war.