党的十九大首次将“生态文明建设”上升到国家“五位一体”总体布局的高度,绿色金融作为生态文明建设的重要内容,其制度体系及标准建设也越发重要。本文通过对国内外绿色金融标准及制度进行比较分析,发现我国与国外在发展模式上存在明显差异:一是西方国家起步快,发展成熟,建立起了相对完善的绿色金融法律体系,而国内法律体系尚未涵盖绿色金融理念;二是国际绿色标准主要是市场需求催生而由非政府组织发起的,我国是由国家政府机构自上而下发起设立的;三是国际上建立了一套相对完善的绿色金融标准,我国绿色金融标准在项目认定、评估和认证等方面不统一。我国可以借鉴国际成功经验,尽快建立统一的绿色金融标准体系,规范我国绿色金融实践。
The 19th CPC National Congress raised the “ecological civilization building” to the national “five-in-one” layout level. As an important part of ecological civilization building,green finance has attached increasingly importance to its system and standard building. Through comparative analysis of domestic and international green financial standards and systems,this report explores the obvious difference between China and the rest of the world in development mode:first,with rapid progress and mature development,western countries have established complete green finance legal system while the domestic legal system has not covered the green finance concept;second,international green standards are mainly driven by market demand and initiated by NGOs. And Chinese green standards are initiated and established by national government authorities from top to bottom. Third,a set of complete green finance standards have been established in the world,but China has no fixed green finance standards in terms of project recognition,evaluation,certification,etc. China may,by reference to international successful experience,build a uniform green finance standard system as soon as possible and regulate China’s green finance practice.