随着缅甸国家政治转型的不断深入,缅甸政治研究逐渐成为学界的一个热点。本文通过梳理和评析该领域的相关成果,发现其中存在诸多因西方话语而引发的偏见和误读。具体而言,缅甸政治研究中的西方话语体系主要由三个方面构成:强调民主在缅甸政治中的天然合法性、对缅甸政治的道德审判以及庇护政治理论的滥用。构建缅甸政治研究的本土性话语体系,关注缅甸基层民众的日常政治,强调跨学科的区域性研究,采取比较政治的视角和方法,是超越缅甸政治研究之西方话语的可行路径。
As the increasingly deepening of the political transition in Myanmar,the political study on Myanmar has been prosperous.Byanalyzing the related achievements in the field,we could easily find that the politics of Myanmar has been tied with a special discourse system of western politics,and been re-constructed and imagined,which has led to lots of prejudices and misreading.Specifically,the western discourse system in Myanmar political studies mainly consists of the following three aspects:emphasis of the natural legitimacy of democracy in the politics of Myanmar,moral judgment to the politics of Myanmar and the overuses of patronage politic theories.A reasonable approach to transcend the western discourse in Myanmar political studies calls to construct a local discourse system of Myanmar politics studies,pay more attention to the daily politics of the Myanmar people,emphasizing interdisciplinary regional studies and adopting a comparative political perspective.
Keywords: | Myanmar PoliticsComparative PoliticsWestern DiscourseLocal DiscourseInterdisciplinary Approach |