全球化的发展推动了人口日益频繁的跨国流动,几乎没有国家可以完全置身于移民浪潮之外。绝大部分国家同时扮演着移民输出国、输入国和中转国的角色。移民群体的非国民性、高流动性以及高异质性的特点使得各国在享受着“移民红利”的同时,也面临着移民问题的严峻挑战。因此,国际移民问题已经成为国际社会和各国政府所面临的重要治理议题之一。新冠病毒的境外输入风险打破了传统移民治理中的“领土陷阱”,迫使移民治理从理念、方法、路径等多方面进行升级转化。这一“升级转化”体现在对移民治理的理论内涵(治理主体、内容与目标、评价指标)、移民治理的模式类型(单元主体主导整合治理模式、双元主体信任契合治理模式、多元主体网络和合治理模式)以及三种不同治理模式所适用情境的深入探讨上。当前,中国移民治理存在治理理念不到位、治理模式太单一、治理方略有局限等内在问题,还面临广源性、亚文化、法外性等诸多外来挑战。只有提升内在治理能力和应对外在挑战,积极参与全球移民治理与跨国的多边合作机制,才能促进我国移民安全、有序和有尊严地流动。
The development of globalization has promoted the increasingly frequent cross-border flow of population. Few countries can completely stay out of the wave of immigration. Most countries play the roles of sending,importing and transit countries at the same time. The characteristics of non-nationals,high mobility and high heterogeneity of immigrant groups make all countries not only enjoy the “immigration dividend”,but also face the severe challenge of immigration. Therefore,the issue of international migration has become one of the important governance issues of the international community and governments. Recently,COVID-19’s overseas entry risk has broken the territorial trap in traditional immigration governance,forcing immigration governance to upgrade and transform from concept,method and path. This upgrading and transformation is reflected in the in-depth discussion of the theoretical connotation of immigration governance,the model types of immigration governance and the applicable situations. At present,China’s immigration governance has internal problems such as inadequate governance concept,single governance model and limited governance strategy. It also faces many external challenges coming from four levels of wide source,subculture,extrajudicial and sudden. China’s immigration governace could be improved by enhancing internal governance capacity to respond to external challenges,and actively participating in global migration governance and transnational multilateral cooperation mechanisms so as to promote the safe,orderly and dignified flow of Chinese immigrants.