您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索
热词推荐: 能源基础设施

相互作用是事物的真正的终极原因——兼论普列汉诺夫的历史观

文章摘要

恩格斯说的“相互作用是事物的真正的终极原因”,包括下面两种情况:一种是从普遍联系的整体中抽象出来的个别事物内部各因素的相互作用,是这个事物发展的真正的终极原因;另一种是在普遍联系的整体中处于基础地位的事物内部各要素的相互作用,是这个事物整体发展的真正的终极原因。本文主要考察第二种情况。既然这种处于基础地位的事物内部各要素之间的相互作用是这个事物整体发展的真正的终极原因,就不能在这个处于基础地位的事物之外再去追溯它发展的原因。例如,在人类社会结构中,物质生产是社会存在和发展的基础,生产力和生产关系之间的相互作用就是社会历史发展的真正的终极原因。因此,不能在物质生产之外再去追溯生产力发展的原因,这样做会陷入“恶无限”的形而上学思维方式。本文首先介绍普列汉诺夫对历史唯物主义的理论来源和马克思创立历史唯物主义、探寻历史发展终极原因的过程,然后考察和分析普列汉诺夫在探讨历史发展的终极原因方面的利弊得失,最后用辩证的思维方法说明不能在生产力和生产关系的相互作用之外去追溯生产力发展的原因。

Abstract

Engels said that “interaction is the real ultimate cause of things”,including the following two situations:one is the interaction of various factors inside an individual thing abstracted from the universally connected whole,which is the real development of this individual thing The ultimate reason;the other is the interaction of the internal elements of things that are in a basic position in the universally connected whole,which is the real ultimate reason for the overall development of this thing. This article mainly examines the second situation. Since the interaction between the various elements in a basic thing is the real ultimate cause of the overall development of this thing,it is impossible to trace the reasons for its development outside the basic thing. For example,in the structure of human society,material production is the foundation of social existence and development,and the interaction between productivity and production relations is the true ultimate cause of social historical development. Therefore,it is impossible to trace the reasons for the development of productive forces in addition to material production. Doing so will fall into the metaphysical way of thinking of “infinite evil”. This article first introduces Plekhanov’s theoretical sources of historical materialism and Marx’s process of establishing historical materialism and exploring the ultimate cause of historical development,and then examines and analyzes Plekhanov’s pros and cons in exploring the ultimate cause of historical development.,Finally,use a dialectical method of thinking to explain that the reasons for the development of productivity cannot be traced beyond the interaction between productivity and production relations.

作者简介
赵家祥:赵家祥(1937~ ),男,天津武清人,北京大学哲学系教授、博士生导师,研究方向为马克思主义哲学、马克思主义哲学史。