本文选取2013年10月2日至2016年10月2日《澳大利亚人报》与《澳大利亚金融评论》关于亚投行的报道。通过Factiva数据库搜索，分别获得130篇和141篇有效样本，并对其进行内容分析和话语分析。本文以框架分析和Normal Fairclough的媒介话语分析法为理论基础和分析工具，借助具有索引、词表生成、主题词计算、搭配和词族提取等多种功能的语料检索软件AntConc3.43，比较分析两家纸媒在澳大利亚拒绝加入亚投行、迟疑和加入后的报道框架差异和变化，并探讨其报道偏向的原因及论证逻辑。研究发现，相关报道呈现“他者化的中国”和“他者智慧的中国”两种框架的交错，从“他者”转向对“我”的凝思。
This study examines the news coverage of AIIB in Australian mainstream newspapers from the theoretical perspective of frame theory and acculturation. Through Factiva corpus，we have collected respectively 130 and 141 articles from The Australian and the Australian Financial Review . The results show there appear the reconciliation of “Other” and “Other's wisdom” of AIIB coverage. In the beginning，it focuses on its purpose in terms of foreign policy agenda，RMB internationalizing and the global governance dominating etc. However，later on，it tends to reconcile the Chinese model，since they have to let it go.
| Keywords： | AIIBFrame AnalysisMedia Discourse |
